A Capehart Scatchard Blog

Tag: PIP coverage

Legislative Update on Haines v. Taft

By on May 30, 2019 in Claims with 0 Comments

I had previously reported on the Supreme Court case of Haines v. Taft, 237 N.J. 271 (2019) which made inadmissible uncompensated medical expenses incurred as a result of an automobile accident that exceeded the plaintiffs’ $15,000 PIP coverage. After I submitted this article, I discussed with plaintiffs’ counsel whether that decision was specifically limited to […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Supreme Court Rules that Plaintiffs Injured in Auto Accident are Barred from Recovering Medical Expenses Less Than $250,000 Statutory Amount Regardless of PIP Coverage Selected

By on March 29, 2019 in Claims with 0 Comments

In Haines v. Taft, 2019 N.J. LEXIS 441 (March 26, 2019), in a split decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Division and found that plaintiffs, who elected a $15,000 PIP coverage, were barred from seeking to recover the amount of their outstanding medical expenses, incurred as a result of an automobile accident, […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Plaintiff not Considered Uninsured While Principally Garaging His Motor Vehicle in NJ but Insuring the Vehicle in His Home State of Louisiana

By on September 8, 2017 in Coverage with 0 Comments

In a novel decision, Ledet v. Oller, No. HUD L-2772-16  (Law Div. Aug. 28, 2017),  the court was asked to decide if the plaintiff was considered to be “culpably uninsured” if his motor vehicle was principally garaged in New Jersey while he attended graduate school but insured and registered in his home state of Louisiana. […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Plaintiff Barred from Pursuing Personal Injury from Auto Accident Due to Failure to Insure

By on January 17, 2017 in Coverage with 0 Comments

Plaintiff Alma Guerrero was driving her car when she was involved in a collision with the defendant Colleen Moore. Plaintiff suffered back injuries from the accident and sued defendant Moore. In Guerrero v. Moore, 2017 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 21 (App. Div. Jan. 5, 2017), Moore defended on the basis that plaintiff was barred from […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Top