A Capehart Scatchard Blog

Homeowner Found Not Liable for Fall on Sidewalk Due to Spiky Seed Pods

By on December 22, 2016 in Liability, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

Plaintiff Katherine Neilson was walking on a sidewalk adjoining the residential property owned by the defendant Antoinette Dunn when she fell on a spiky seed pod, suffering injury. The seed pod came from sweetgum trees located on defendant’s property. In Neilson v. Dunn, 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2668 (App. Div. December 5, 2016), plaintiff […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Allocation of Negligence as to Fictitious Defendant Permitted in Personal Injury Action

By on December 16, 2016 in Negligence, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

Plaintiff Mark Krzykalski sued defendants David Tindall and a John Doe, alleging negligence in the operation of their vehicles that caused an accident in which he was injured. At trial, the judge allowed the jury to allocate negligence between defendant Tindall and the fictitiously named John Doe. In the published decision of Krzykalski v. Tindall, […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Mere Sponsorship of an Event Held to be Insufficient to Impose Liability for Personal Injury

By on December 9, 2016 in Liability, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

Plaintiff Rosa Sands was injured when she fell down an approximate 2 foot embankment after leaving a dinner party on a beach in Mexico. The dinner party was part of a promotional event known as “Raise the Bar” offered by certain defendants, including Reebok International and Adidas American, Inc. (the “Reebok defendants.”) In Sands v. […]

Share

Continue Reading »

When is a Condition an “Open and Obvious Defect”?

By on December 2, 2016 in Duty of Care, Liability, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

A business owner owes to its invitees a duty of reasonable care to provide a safe premises. This duty includes an affirmative duty to inspect the premises and requires the business owner to discover and eliminate dangerous conditions and to maintain the premises in a safe condition. But, what if the condition is an “open […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Plaintiff Permitted to “Board” Full Amount of Medical Expenses Not Covered by PIP

By on November 18, 2016 in Coverage, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

Plaintiff Angel Viruet, Jr. was injured in an automobile accident and sued Defendant Fernando Maoine for his injuries. Plaintiff was insured by GEICO Insurance Company for his automobile insurance and had selected a limited PIP medical coverage benefits of $15,000. In Viruet v. Maoine, 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2426 (Law Div. Nov. 4, 2016), […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Plaintiff’s Flooring Expert Report Barred as Net Opinion

By on November 11, 2016 in Negligence, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

Plaintiff Elaine Anderocci was shopping in a retail store known as Reed Krakoff, in the Short Hills Mall, when she reached for a handbag and slipped and fell, fracturing her shoulder. Plaintiff claimed that the floor was very slippery, “like a sheet of glass.” In Anderocci v. Coach, Inc., 2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2343 […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Supreme Court Defines Criteria for Granting Remittitur of Jury Verdict

By on November 4, 2016 in Awards, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

A motion for remittitur is used by a defendant to attempt to obtain a reduction of an excessive jury verdict. A court has the power to reduce an excessive award through a grant of remittitur. In the recent case of Cuevas v. Wentworth Group, 226 N.J. 480 (2016), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Court Rules that Settling Co-Defendant Charge Not Appropriate When Defendant Settles Before Trial

By on October 28, 2016 in NJ Litigation, Settlements with 0 Comments

In the recent published Law Division decision, Hernandez v. Chekenian, 2016 N.J. Super. LEXIS 133 (Law Div. July 15, 2016), the trial court ruled that when a defendant settles with the plaintiff before the commencement of trial, the remaining defendants are not entitled to the “Settling Defendant charge.” In Hernandez, the judge considered whether it […]

Share

Continue Reading »

The Special Employer Rule May Bar Civil Lawsuits by Temporary Employees for Injuries Sustained on the Temporary Jobs

While it is well settled that the Workers’ Compensation Act bars employees from recovering in a civil suit against their employers for injuries sustained on the job, it is not as well known that a second employer, a “special employer,” may also find protection against suits from their “special employees” through the application of the […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Constructive Notice May be an Issue in a Premises Liability Personal Injury Suit

By on October 14, 2016 in Liability, NJ Litigation with 2 Comments

A business owner owes an invitee a duty to discover and eliminate dangerous conditions and to maintain their premises in a safe condition. For an injured plaintiff to prove a breach of that duty, if the owner did not create the condition, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had actual or constructive knowledge of […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Top