A Capehart Scatchard Blog

Tag: automobile insurance

Appellate Division Upholds Shorter Statute of Limitations in Insurance Policy for UIM Claim

Appellate Division Upholds Shorter Statute of Limitations in Insurance Policy for UIM Claim

On January 10, 2018, plaintiff Amy Vanrell was driving a motor vehicle covered by an insurance policy with USAA and was in an accident.  She sued the other driver for her injuries but failed to make a claim against her insurance company, USAA, for underinsured motorist coverage until May 2, 2022.  The issue in Vanrell […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Plaintiff Unable to Collect Judgment Over Insurance Coverage Amount for Bankrupt Defendant

By on June 20, 2025 in Coverage, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments
Plaintiff Unable to Collect Judgment Over Insurance Coverage Amount for Bankrupt Defendant

Plaintiff Keith Hacker was in a motor vehicle accident with defendant Carlos Jaime-Valdez on January 27, 2018.  Defendant Jaime-Valdez had $100,000 of insurance coverage each with both State Farm and Geico.  After answering the complaint, Jaime-Valdez filed for bankruptcy. The issue in Hacker v. Jaime-Valdez, 2025 N.J. Super. LEXIS 44 (App. Div. June 13, 2025) […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Plaintiff’s Bodily Injury Claim Dismissed Due to Her Failure to Provide a Comparative Analysis With Her Pre-Existing Condition

By on March 21, 2025 in Insurance, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments
Plaintiff’s Bodily Injury Claim Dismissed Due to Her Failure to Provide a Comparative Analysis With Her Pre-Existing Condition

Plaintiff Debbie Williams-Siraj claims to have been injured in an automobile accident on September 28, 2017, when the vehicle driven by defendant Lynne Schwartz collided with her.  Although plaintiff claimed to have suffered significant injuries to her lower back including spinal disc herniations and fractures, she had been previously diagnosed with chronic and progressive lumbar […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Appellate Division Upholds Summary Judgment Dismissal of Suit for Plaintiff’s Failure to Maintain New Jersey Automobile Insurance

By on January 16, 2025 in Insurance, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments
Appellate Division Upholds Summary Judgment Dismissal of Suit for Plaintiff’s Failure to Maintain New Jersey Automobile Insurance

Plaintiff Ramon Hernandez claimed to have suffered injuries when his car was struck in the rear on a New Jersey road by a car being driven by defendant Hannah Kurtz and owned by co-defendant Eric Kurtz. In Hernandez v. Kurtz, 2024 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 3049 (App. Div. Dec. 17, 2024), the issue was whether […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Plaintiff Found to Be Eligible for PIP Benefits for Burns Suffered From Hot Tea Spilled on Her at Dunkin’ Donuts Drive-Through

By on October 25, 2024 in Coverage, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments
Plaintiff Found to Be Eligible for PIP Benefits for Burns Suffered From Hot Tea Spilled on Her at Dunkin’ Donuts Drive-Through

Plaintiff, Shani Harrell, made a claim against her automobile insurance company, Progressive Garden State Insurance Company (“Progressive”), for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits when she suffered severe burns to her body after a restaurant employee spilled a hot beverage on her at a Dunkin’ Donuts drive-through.  She applied to Progressive for PIP benefits under her […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Appellate Division Finds Coverage Under Loading and Unloading Doctrine for Donut Shop Sued in Serving Customer Hot Tea Through Drive Through Window

By on July 26, 2024 in Insurance, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments
Appellate Division Finds Coverage Under Loading and Unloading Doctrine for Donut Shop Sued in Serving Customer Hot Tea Through Drive Through Window

By: Victoria M. Adeleke, Law ClerkEdited by: Betsy G. Ramos, Esq. Plaintiffs Bridgewater Donuts, LLC and Tamar, Inc. filed a lawsuit against defendant Geico Indemnity Co. seeking coverage under an automobile liability policy issued to Susan Mendelsohn-Hall. Mendelsohn-Hall alleged she suffered injuries when hot tea spilled on her at the Dunkin’ Donuts drive-through, leading to […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Insurance Carrier Not Estopped From Denying Coverage After Affording Defense of Its Insured From an Automobile Accident

By on December 15, 2023 in Coverage, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

This case involved an insurance coverage dispute from an automobile accident involving an employee of defendant Century Waste Services, LLC (“Century”).  The employee was driving a vehicle owned by a manager’s mother, which was a vehicle not covered under the insurance policy issued to Century by United Specialty Insurance Company (“USI”).  The trial court had […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Court Finds That Plaintiff Not Entitled to PIP Benefits For Injury While Operating an Electric Scooter

By on July 21, 2023 in Insurance, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

Plaintiff David Goyco was involved in an accident in which an automobile struck him while he was operating a low-speed electric scooter.  He applied to his auto insurance company, Progressive Insurance Company, for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to pay for his medical expenses. The issue in Goyco v. Progressive Insurance Company, 2023 N.J. Super. […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Breaching the Verbal Threshold for an Automobile Accident Injury through Scarring or a Permanent Injury

The Verbal Threshold is a requirement set by the New Jersey Legislature for an individual to be compensated for bodily injuries suffered in an auto accident. The Verbal Threshold, or the Limitation on Lawsuit option, was created to reduce the cost of car insurance by limiting a person’s ability to seek compensation for noneconomic damages. […]

Share

Continue Reading »

New Jersey Driver With New York Auto Policy Considered To Be Uninsured And Barred From Pursuing Personal Injury Claim

By on March 11, 2022 in Insurance, NJ Litigation with 0 Comments

Plaintiff Adam Haber was involved in an automobile accident with the defendant Faith Geruldsen on March 7, 2019.  At that time, plaintiff resided in New Jersey with his car garaged in New Jersey but he had a New York auto insurance policy.  The issue in Haber v. Geruldsen, 2021 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2943 (App. […]

Share

Continue Reading »

Top